Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EMORY REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EMORY REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 113031 | GA | 56 beds | Current EBITDA $742K → Pro Forma $2.3M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$30.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$742K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$454K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$607K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$601K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$369K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$607K$607K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$584K$17K$601K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$93K$276K$369K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$152K$303K$455K$607K$607K$607K$607K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$150K$300K$451K$601K$601K$601K$601K
A/R Days Reduction$0$123K$246K$369K$369K$369K$369K$369K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$435K$869K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x84% / 21.0x88% / 23.6x92% / 26.3x94% / 27.7x96% / 29.0x
9.0x79% / 18.3x83% / 20.7x87% / 23.1x89% / 24.2x91% / 25.4x
10.0x74% / 16.1x79% / 18.3x83% / 20.4x85% / 21.5x87% / 22.6x
11.0x70% / 14.4x75% / 16.3x79% / 18.3x81% / 19.2x82% / 20.2x
12.0x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.7x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.4x79% / 18.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.8x
Headroom (turns)
59%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 59% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.7x, adding 5.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$742K$742K2.4%
Year 1$765K+$1.1M$1.8M6.0%
Year 2$787K+$1.6M$2.4M7.9%
Year 3$811K+$1.6M$2.4M7.9%
Year 4$835K+$1.6M$2.4M8.0%
Year 5$860K+$1.6M$2.5M8.1%
$7.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$27.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$19.6M
Value Created
$2.5M
Exit EBITDA
$1.2M
Organic Growth
$16.0M
RCM Value Creation
$2.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$303K$455K$607K$728K
Denial Rate Reductio$300K$451K$601K$721K
A/R Days Reduction$185K$277K$369K$443K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$19K$23K
Total$798K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 67 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.4%-15.8%-1.6%6.7%
P65
Net-to-Gross35.8%18.8%30.6%38.0%
P70
Occupancy75.9%27.5%53.7%77.3%
P73
Rev/Bed$542K$479K$648K$1.4M
P33
Exp/Bed$529K$488K$764K$1.5M
P28

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML