Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REGENCY HOSPITAL OF MACON LLC 2026-04-26 09:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REGENCY HOSPITAL OF MACON LLC
CCN 112016 | GA | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $-74K → Pro Forma $1.4M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$28.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-74K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$439K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$575K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$569K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$350K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$575K$575K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$553K$16K$569K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$88K$261K$350K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$144K$287K$431K$575K$575K$575K$575K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$142K$284K$427K$569K$569K$569K$569K
A/R Days Reduction$0$117K$233K$350K$350K$350K$350K$350K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$412K$823K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-0.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.9x
Headroom (turns)
107%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 107% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -0.4x, adding 99.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-74K$-74K-0.3%
Year 1$-77K+$1.0M$931K3.2%
Year 2$-79K+$1.5M$1.4M5.0%
Year 3$-81K+$1.5M$1.4M5.0%
Year 4$-84K+$1.5M$1.4M5.0%
Year 5$-86K+$1.5M$1.4M5.0%
$-743K
Entry EV (10x)
$15.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$16.4M
Value Created
$1.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-118K
Organic Growth
$15.1M
RCM Value Creation
$1.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$287K$431K$575K$690K
Denial Rate Reductio$284K$427K$569K$683K
A/R Days Reduction$175K$262K$350K$420K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$18K$22K
Total$756K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 69 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.3%-15.0%-1.4%7.2%
P53
Net-to-Gross12.5%18.6%30.4%38.1%
P5
Occupancy68.3%30.5%60.4%79.5%
P58
Rev/Bed$479K$479K$680K$1.4M
P23
Exp/Bed$480K$480K$769K$1.5M
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML