Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MORGAN MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 23:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MORGAN MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 111304 | GA | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.2M → Pro Forma $622K (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 111304

MORGAN MEDICAL CENTER
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$35.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$622K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$576K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$711K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$704K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$432K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$23K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$711K$711K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$684K$20K$704K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$109K$323K$432K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$23K$23K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$178K$355K$533K$711K$711K$711K$711K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$176K$352K$528K$704K$704K$704K$704K
A/R Days Reduction$0$144K$288K$432K$432K$432K$432K$432K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K
Cumulative$0$509K$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-17.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
23.5x
Headroom (turns)
361%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 361% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -17.0x, adding 116.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.2M$-1.2M-3.5%
Year 1$-1.3M+$1.2M$-39K-0.1%
Year 2$-1.3M+$1.9M$546K1.5%
Year 3$-1.4M+$1.9M$506K1.4%
Year 4$-1.4M+$1.9M$465K1.3%
Year 5$-1.4M+$1.9M$423K1.2%
$-12.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$4.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$17.1M
Value Created
$423K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.0M
Organic Growth
$18.7M
RCM Value Creation
$423K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$355K$533K$711K$853K
Denial Rate Reductio$352K$528K$704K$844K
A/R Days Reduction$216K$324K$432K$519K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$17K$23K$27K
Total$935K$1.4M$1.9M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 63 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.5%-20.1%-3.8%5.5%
P51
Net-to-Gross64.2%28.7%36.6%50.7%
P84
Occupancy59.7%21.3%40.5%55.1%
P78
Rev/Bed$1.4M$489K$717K$1.3M
P84
Exp/Bed$1.5M$580K$776K$1.2M
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML