Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EMORY JOHNS CREEK HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EMORY JOHNS CREEK HOSPITAL
CCN 110230 | GA | 154 beds | Current EBITDA $9.5M → Pro Forma $23.7M (+$14.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$269.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$9.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$23.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$14.2M
Modeled Uplift
$10.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.6M (vs $14.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$172K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.4M$5.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.2M$148K$5.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$826K$2.4M$3.3M$10.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$172K$172K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$86K$172K$172K$172K$172K$172K$172K
Cumulative$0$3.9M$7.7M$11.5M$14.2M$14.2M$14.2M$14.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x74% / 16.1x79% / 18.3x83% / 20.4x85% / 21.5x87% / 22.6x
9.0x69% / 14.0x74% / 15.9x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.8x82% / 19.7x
10.0x65% / 12.2x69% / 14.0x73% / 15.7x75% / 16.6x77% / 17.4x
11.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.4x69% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.5x
12.0x57% / 9.7x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.3x69% / 14.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.1x
Headroom (turns)
48%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 48% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.4x, adding 5.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$9.5M$9.5M3.5%
Year 1$9.8M+$9.4M$19.2M7.1%
Year 2$10.1M+$14.2M$24.2M9.0%
Year 3$10.4M+$14.2M$24.5M9.1%
Year 4$10.7M+$14.2M$24.8M9.2%
Year 5$11.0M+$14.2M$25.2M9.4%
$95.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$276.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$181.8M
Value Created
$25.2M
Exit EBITDA
$15.1M
Organic Growth
$141.6M
RCM Value Creation
$25.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$6.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.7M$4.0M$5.3M$6.4M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$86K$129K$172K$207K
Total$7.1M$10.6M$14.2M$17.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.5%-12.8%-0.9%6.9%
P65
Net-to-Gross29.9%16.7%23.2%29.4%
P75
Occupancy87.4%59.6%75.1%84.5%
P76
Rev/Bed$1.7M$715K$1.3M$1.7M
P77
Exp/Bed$1.7M$813K$1.3M$1.8M
P72

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML