Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PIEDMONT COLUMBUS REGIONAL NORTHSIDE 2026-04-26 12:28 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PIEDMONT COLUMBUS REGIONAL NORTHSIDE
CCN 110200 | GA | 71 beds | Current EBITDA $29.4M → Pro Forma $36.5M (+$7.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$135.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$29.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$36.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$7.1M
Modeled Uplift
$5.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.2M (vs $7.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$87K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.7M$2.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.6M$75K$2.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$416K$1.2M$1.6M$5.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$87K$87K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$677K$1.4M$2.0M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$671K$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$550K$1.1M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$43K$87K$87K$87K$87K$87K$87K
Cumulative$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.8M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
9.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$29.4M$29.4M21.7%
Year 1$30.2M+$4.8M$35.0M25.8%
Year 2$31.2M+$7.1M$38.3M28.3%
Year 3$32.1M+$7.1M$39.2M28.9%
Year 4$33.1M+$7.1M$40.2M29.7%
Year 5$34.0M+$7.1M$41.2M30.4%
$293.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$452.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$159.2M
Value Created
$41.2M
Exit EBITDA
$46.8M
Organic Growth
$71.3M
RCM Value Creation
$41.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.4M$2.0M$2.7M$3.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
A/R Days Reduction$824K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$43K$65K$87K$104K
Total$3.6M$5.3M$7.1M$8.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 71 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.7%-13.3%-1.0%8.4%
P89
Net-to-Gross23.1%18.4%29.2%37.3%
P37
Occupancy74.8%37.5%67.4%80.2%
P65
Rev/Bed$1.9M$484K$728K$1.6M
P85
Exp/Bed$1.5M$468K$847K$1.5M
P72

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML