Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PIEDMONT HOSPITAL INC. 2026-04-26 06:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PIEDMONT HOSPITAL INC.
CCN 110083 | GA | 569 beds | Current EBITDA $53.4M → Pro Forma $123.0M (+$69.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.32B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$53.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$69.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$123.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$50.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$69.6M
Modeled Uplift
$49.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$20.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $49.2M (vs $69.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$26.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$26.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$16.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$847K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$69.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$26.5M$26.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$25.5M$727K$26.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4.1M$12.0M$16.1M$50.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$847K$847K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.6M$13.2M$19.8M$26.5M$26.5M$26.5M$26.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.5M$13.1M$19.6M$26.2M$26.2M$26.2M$26.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.4M$10.7M$16.1M$16.1M$16.1M$16.1M$16.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$423K$847K$847K$847K$847K$847K$847K
Cumulative$0$18.9M$37.9M$56.4M$69.6M$69.6M$69.6M$69.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $69.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x71% / 14.8x76% / 16.8x80% / 18.8x82% / 19.8x83% / 20.8x
9.0x66% / 12.8x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.3x77% / 17.2x78% / 18.1x
10.0x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.8x70% / 14.4x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.0x
11.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.3x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.2x
12.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.8x
Headroom (turns)
43%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 43% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.7x, adding 4.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$53.4M$53.4M4.0%
Year 1$55.0M+$46.4M$101.4M7.7%
Year 2$56.6M+$69.6M$126.2M9.5%
Year 3$58.3M+$69.6M$127.9M9.7%
Year 4$60.1M+$69.6M$129.7M9.8%
Year 5$61.9M+$69.6M$131.5M9.9%
$533.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.45B
Exit EV (11x)
$912.3M
Value Created
$131.5M
Exit EBITDA
$85.0M
Organic Growth
$695.9M
RCM Value Creation
$131.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$13.2M$19.8M$26.5M$31.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$13.1M$19.6M$26.2M$31.4M
A/R Days Reduction$8.0M$12.1M$16.1M$19.3M
Clean Claim Rate$423K$635K$847K$1.0M
Total$34.8M$52.2M$69.6M$83.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 27 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.0%-8.2%-1.0%5.8%
P63
Net-to-Gross22.1%19.6%21.7%29.1%
P52
Occupancy80.2%72.0%79.5%85.4%
P59
Rev/Bed$2.3M$1.2M$1.7M$2.4M
P67
Exp/Bed$2.2M$1.2M$1.7M$2.2M
P74

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML