Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PIEDMONT NEWTON HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PIEDMONT NEWTON HOSPITAL
CCN 110018 | GA | 94 beds | Current EBITDA $7.1M → Pro Forma $14.9M (+$7.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$148.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$7.8M
Modeled Uplift
$5.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.7M (vs $7.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$95K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.0M$3.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.9M$82K$2.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$456K$1.4M$1.8M$5.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$95K$95K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$743K$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$735K$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$602K$1.2M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$48K$95K$95K$95K$95K$95K$95K
Cumulative$0$2.1M$4.3M$6.3M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x68% / 13.2x72% / 15.1x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.7x
9.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 13.0x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.3x
10.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x
11.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x
12.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.5x
Headroom (turns)
38%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 38% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.0x, adding 4.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.1M$7.1M4.8%
Year 1$7.3M+$5.2M$12.6M8.5%
Year 2$7.6M+$7.8M$15.4M10.4%
Year 3$7.8M+$7.8M$15.6M10.5%
Year 4$8.0M+$7.8M$15.8M10.7%
Year 5$8.3M+$7.8M$16.1M10.8%
$71.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$176.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$105.6M
Value Created
$16.1M
Exit EBITDA
$11.4M
Organic Growth
$78.1M
RCM Value Creation
$16.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
A/R Days Reduction$904K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$48K$71K$95K$114K
Total$3.9M$5.9M$7.8M$9.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 68 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.8%-12.6%-1.0%8.8%
P66
Net-to-Gross15.7%18.1%26.4%35.3%
P14
Occupancy73.9%50.3%70.1%81.7%
P53
Rev/Bed$1.6M$489K$909K$1.7M
P68
Exp/Bed$1.5M$453K$951K$1.7M
P69

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML