Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HAMILTON MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:56 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HAMILTON MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 110001 | GA | 221 beds | Current EBITDA $18.4M → Pro Forma $36.8M (+$18.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$349.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$18.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$36.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$18.4M
Modeled Uplift
$12.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.5M (vs $18.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$224K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.0M$7.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.7M$192K$6.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.2M$4.3M$13.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$224K$224K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$112K$224K$224K$224K$224K$224K$224K
Cumulative$0$5.0M$10.0M$14.9M$18.4M$18.4M$18.4M$18.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.3x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.8x
9.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.3x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x
10.0x56% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x
11.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x
12.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.3x
Headroom (turns)
35%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 35% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.2x, adding 4.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$18.4M$18.4M5.3%
Year 1$19.0M+$12.3M$31.2M8.9%
Year 2$19.5M+$18.4M$37.9M10.8%
Year 3$20.1M+$18.4M$38.5M11.0%
Year 4$20.7M+$18.4M$39.1M11.2%
Year 5$21.3M+$18.4M$39.7M11.4%
$184.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$437.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$253.0M
Value Created
$39.7M
Exit EBITDA
$29.3M
Organic Growth
$183.9M
RCM Value Creation
$39.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$8.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.5M$5.2M$6.9M$8.3M
A/R Days Reduction$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$5.1M
Clean Claim Rate$112K$168K$224K$269K
Total$9.2M$13.8M$18.4M$22.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.3%-10.9%-0.9%9.0%
P65
Net-to-Gross23.5%18.1%21.6%27.5%
P55
Occupancy56.9%66.0%76.7%86.5%
P8
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.0M$1.5M$1.8M
P53
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.0M$1.5M$1.8M
P51

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML