Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PORT ST LUCIE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 19:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PORT ST LUCIE HOSPITAL
CCN 104070 | FL | 75 beds | Current EBITDA $2.5M → Pro Forma $3.4M (+$863K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$863K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$629K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$863K
Modeled Uplift
$621K
Risk-Adjusted
-$241K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$328K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$325K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$200K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$863K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$328K$328K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$316K$9K$325K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$50K$149K$200K$629K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$82K$164K$246K$328K$328K$328K$328K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$81K$162K$244K$325K$325K$325K$325K
A/R Days Reduction$0$67K$133K$200K$200K$200K$200K$200K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$235K$470K$700K$863K$863K$863K$863K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $863K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
12.0x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.5M$2.5M15.4%
Year 1$2.6M+$575K$3.2M19.4%
Year 2$2.7M+$863K$3.5M21.6%
Year 3$2.8M+$863K$3.6M22.1%
Year 4$2.8M+$863K$3.7M22.6%
Year 5$2.9M+$863K$3.8M23.1%
$25.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$41.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$16.4M
Value Created
$3.8M
Exit EBITDA
$4.0M
Organic Growth
$8.6M
RCM Value Creation
$3.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$164K$246K$328K$394K
Denial Rate Reductio$162K$244K$325K$390K
A/R Days Reduction$100K$150K$200K$239K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$10K$13K
Total$431K$647K$863K$1.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 121 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.4%-9.3%2.9%11.8%
P82
Net-to-Gross43.2%15.1%22.5%38.6%
P77
Occupancy81.5%50.8%63.8%77.4%
P79
Rev/Bed$219K$243K$545K$1.1M
P20
Exp/Bed$185K$323K$572K$1.1M
P11

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML