Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NICKLAUS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NICKLAUS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
CCN 103301 | FL | 259 beds | Current EBITDA $42.4M → Pro Forma $82.8M (+$40.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$769.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$42.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$40.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$82.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$29.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$40.5M
Modeled Uplift
$28.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $28.7M (vs $40.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$15.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$15.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$492K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$40.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$15.4M$15.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$14.8M$423K$15.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.4M$7.0M$9.4M$29.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$492K$492K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.8M$7.7M$11.5M$15.4M$15.4M$15.4M$15.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.8M$7.6M$11.4M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$246K$492K$492K$492K$492K$492K$492K
Cumulative$0$11.0M$22.0M$32.8M$40.5M$40.5M$40.5M$40.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $40.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.9x73% / 15.7x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.4x
9.0x60% / 10.5x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x
10.0x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.2x
11.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x
12.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.2x
Headroom (turns)
33%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 33% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.3x, adding 4.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$42.4M$42.4M5.5%
Year 1$43.6M+$27.0M$70.6M9.2%
Year 2$45.0M+$40.5M$85.4M11.1%
Year 3$46.3M+$40.5M$86.8M11.3%
Year 4$47.7M+$40.5M$88.2M11.5%
Year 5$49.1M+$40.5M$89.6M11.6%
$423.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$985.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$561.8M
Value Created
$89.6M
Exit EBITDA
$67.5M
Organic Growth
$404.7M
RCM Value Creation
$89.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.7M$11.5M$15.4M$18.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.6M$11.4M$15.2M$18.3M
A/R Days Reduction$4.7M$7.0M$9.4M$11.2M
Clean Claim Rate$246K$369K$492K$591K
Total$20.2M$30.4M$40.5M$48.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 110 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.5%-5.1%2.8%17.1%
P55
Net-to-Gross32.2%10.0%14.2%20.5%
P94
Occupancy64.4%52.6%64.4%75.3%
P50
Rev/Bed$3.0M$828K$1.2M$1.4M
P97
Exp/Bed$2.8M$753K$971K$1.3M
P97

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML