Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 14:09 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 103049 | FL | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $1.1M → Pro Forma $1.6M (+$497K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$9.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$497K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+533bps
Margin Improvement
$358K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$497K
Modeled Uplift
$336K
Risk-Adjusted
-$161K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$188K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$187K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$113K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+10bp
Total EBITDA Impact$497K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$180K$8K$188K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$187K$187K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$29K$85K$113K$358K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$47K$94K$141K$188K$188K$188K$188K
Cost to Collect$0$47K$93K$140K$187K$187K$187K$187K
A/R Days Reduction$0$38K$76K$113K$113K$113K$113K$113K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$136K$272K$404K$497K$497K$497K$497K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $497K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
9.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
10.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
11.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.1M$1.1M11.8%
Year 1$1.1M+$332K$1.5M15.7%
Year 2$1.2M+$497K$1.7M17.9%
Year 3$1.2M+$497K$1.7M18.2%
Year 4$1.2M+$497K$1.7M18.6%
Year 5$1.3M+$497K$1.8M19.0%
$11.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$19.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.5M
Value Created
$1.8M
Exit EBITDA
$1.8M
Organic Growth
$5.0M
RCM Value Creation
$1.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$94K$141K$188K$225K
Cost to Collect$93K$140K$187K$224K
A/R Days Reduction$57K$85K$113K$136K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$249K$373K$497K$597K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 79 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.8%-18.7%1.8%11.8%
P74
Net-to-Gross59.2%19.6%33.8%60.0%
P72
Occupancy51.4%43.7%60.4%81.7%
P34
Rev/Bed$233K$235K$481K$639K
P24
Exp/Bed$206K$316K$510K$939K
P13

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML