Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 17:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 103042 | FL | 80 beds | Current EBITDA $3.8M → Pro Forma $5.5M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$32.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$482K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$655K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$648K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$398K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$655K$655K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$630K$18K$648K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$100K$298K$398K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$164K$327K$491K$655K$655K$655K$655K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$162K$324K$486K$648K$648K$648K$648K
A/R Days Reduction$0$133K$266K$398K$398K$398K$398K$398K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$469K$938K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.5x
9.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
10.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x
11.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.8M$3.8M11.5%
Year 1$3.9M+$1.1M$5.0M15.3%
Year 2$4.0M+$1.7M$5.7M17.4%
Year 3$4.1M+$1.7M$5.8M17.8%
Year 4$4.2M+$1.7M$6.0M18.2%
Year 5$4.4M+$1.7M$6.1M18.6%
$37.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$66.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$29.3M
Value Created
$6.1M
Exit EBITDA
$6.0M
Organic Growth
$17.2M
RCM Value Creation
$6.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$327K$491K$655K$786K
Denial Rate Reductio$324K$486K$648K$778K
A/R Days Reduction$199K$299K$398K$478K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$16K$21K$25K
Total$861K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 123 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.5%-10.0%2.8%11.8%
P73
Net-to-Gross68.3%15.3%22.5%38.6%
P90
Occupancy76.7%50.2%63.5%77.2%
P72
Rev/Bed$409K$247K$550K$1.1M
P34
Exp/Bed$362K$324K$574K$1.1M
P28

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML