Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - PANAMA CITY INC 2026-04-26 13:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - PANAMA CITY INC
CCN 102017 | FL | 30 beds | Current EBITDA $6.1M → Pro Forma $7.0M (+$908K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$908K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$662K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$908K
Modeled Uplift
$681K
Risk-Adjusted
-$227K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$345K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$342K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$210K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$908K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$345K$345K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$332K$9K$342K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$53K$157K$210K$662K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$86K$173K$259K$345K$345K$345K$345K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$85K$171K$256K$342K$342K$342K$342K
A/R Days Reduction$0$70K$140K$210K$210K$210K$210K$210K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$247K$494K$736K$908K$908K$908K$908K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $908K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
9.0x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
10.0x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x
11.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x
12.0x26% / 3.1x31% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.9x
Headroom (turns)
-13%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -13% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.4x, adding 1.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.1M$6.1M35.2%
Year 1$6.3M+$605K$6.9M39.8%
Year 2$6.5M+$908K$7.4M42.7%
Year 3$6.6M+$908K$7.6M43.8%
Year 4$6.8M+$908K$7.8M44.9%
Year 5$7.0M+$908K$8.0M46.1%
$60.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$87.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$26.7M
Value Created
$8.0M
Exit EBITDA
$9.7M
Organic Growth
$9.1M
RCM Value Creation
$8.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$173K$259K$345K$414K
Denial Rate Reductio$171K$256K$342K$410K
A/R Days Reduction$105K$157K$210K$252K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$8K$11K$13K
Total$454K$681K$908K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin35.2%-26.7%-1.9%7.4%
P96
Net-to-Gross15.5%20.2%29.4%58.3%
P13
Occupancy85.0%33.3%56.3%80.3%
P82
Rev/Bed$575K$257K$502K$648K
P64
Exp/Bed$372K$401K$536K$996K
P20

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML