Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH -ORLANDO 2026-04-26 07:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH -ORLANDO
CCN 102003 | FL | 99 beds | Current EBITDA $3.2M → Pro Forma $6.3M (+$3.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$60.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$3.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$791K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$731K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$38K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$33K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$184K$546K$731K$2.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$38K$38K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$300K$600K$901K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$297K$594K$892K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$244K$487K$731K$731K$731K$731K$731K
Clean Claim Rate$0$19K$38K$38K$38K$38K$38K$38K
Cumulative$0$860K$1.7M$2.6M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.3x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.8x
9.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.3x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.4x
10.0x56% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x68% / 13.6x
11.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.1x
12.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.3x
Headroom (turns)
35%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 35% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.2x, adding 4.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.2M$3.2M5.3%
Year 1$3.3M+$2.1M$5.4M8.9%
Year 2$3.4M+$3.2M$6.5M10.9%
Year 3$3.5M+$3.2M$6.6M11.0%
Year 4$3.6M+$3.2M$6.7M11.2%
Year 5$3.7M+$3.2M$6.8M11.4%
$31.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$75.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$43.5M
Value Created
$6.8M
Exit EBITDA
$5.0M
Organic Growth
$31.6M
RCM Value Creation
$6.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$600K$901K$1.2M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$594K$892K$1.2M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$365K$548K$731K$877K
Clean Claim Rate$19K$29K$38K$46K
Total$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 118 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.3%-7.1%4.8%14.0%
P52
Net-to-Gross12.0%13.7%20.5%38.2%
P19
Occupancy89.7%49.9%63.2%76.9%
P89
Rev/Bed$606K$304K$606K$1.2M
P50
Exp/Bed$574K$340K$647K$1.1M
P44

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML