Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST. VINCENTS ST. JOHNS COU 2026-04-26 17:17 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST. VINCENTS ST. JOHNS COU
CCN 100361 | FL | 56 beds | Current EBITDA $-10.2M → Pro Forma $-8.4M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$33.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-10.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-8.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$668K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$672K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$665K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$409K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$672K$672K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$647K$18K$665K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$103K$306K$409K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$168K$336K$504K$672K$672K$672K$672K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$166K$333K$499K$665K$665K$665K$665K
A/R Days Reduction$0$136K$273K$409K$409K$409K$409K$409K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$481K$963K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-10.2M$-10.2M-30.4%
Year 1$-10.5M+$1.2M$-9.3M-27.8%
Year 2$-10.8M+$1.8M$-9.1M-27.0%
Year 3$-11.1M+$1.8M$-9.4M-27.9%
Year 4$-11.5M+$1.8M$-9.7M-28.9%
Year 5$-11.8M+$1.8M$-10.1M-29.9%
$-102.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-110.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$-8.6M
Value Created
$-10.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-16.2M
Organic Growth
$17.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-10.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$336K$504K$672K$806K
Denial Rate Reductio$333K$499K$665K$798K
A/R Days Reduction$204K$307K$409K$491K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$21K$26K
Total$884K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 97 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-30.4%-11.6%3.9%12.3%
P9
Net-to-Gross15.8%15.6%24.8%45.1%
P28
Occupancy28.0%48.7%63.8%81.5%
P8
Rev/Bed$600K$239K$497K$933K
P62
Exp/Bed$782K$268K$510K$922K
P69

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML