Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MELBOURNE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MELBOURNE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 100291 | FL | 96 beds | Current EBITDA $8.8M → Pro Forma $15.1M (+$6.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$120.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$6.3M
Modeled Uplift
$4.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.0M
Execution Discount
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.3M (vs $6.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$77K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.4M$2.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.3M$66K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$369K$1.1M$1.5M$4.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$77K$77K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$601K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$595K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$487K$975K$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$38K$77K$77K$77K$77K$77K$77K
Cumulative$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.5x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x
9.0x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.3x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.0x
10.0x51% / 7.7x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
11.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
12.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
24%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 24% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.8M$8.8M7.3%
Year 1$9.1M+$4.2M$13.3M11.0%
Year 2$9.3M+$6.3M$15.6M13.0%
Year 3$9.6M+$6.3M$15.9M13.3%
Year 4$9.9M+$6.3M$16.2M13.5%
Year 5$10.2M+$6.3M$16.5M13.7%
$87.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$181.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$93.7M
Value Created
$16.5M
Exit EBITDA
$14.0M
Organic Growth
$63.2M
RCM Value Creation
$16.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$731K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$38K$58K$77K$92K
Total$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$7.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 119 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.3%-8.1%3.8%13.0%
P60
Net-to-Gross10.9%14.3%20.7%38.0%
P15
Occupancy51.2%49.1%63.5%77.1%
P29
Rev/Bed$1.3M$305K$583K$1.2M
P78
Exp/Bed$1.2M$342K$630K$1.1M
P77

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML