Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SEVEN RIVERS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 17:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SEVEN RIVERS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 100249 | FL | 121 beds | Current EBITDA $16.2M → Pro Forma $22.8M (+$6.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$124.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$16.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$22.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$6.5M
Modeled Uplift
$4.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.6M (vs $6.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$79K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.5M$2.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.4M$68K$2.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$381K$1.1M$1.5M$4.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$79K$79K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$621K$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$615K$1.2M$1.8M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$504K$1.0M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$40K$79K$79K$79K$79K$79K$79K
Cumulative$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.3M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x
9.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
10.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
11.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
12.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$16.2M$16.2M13.1%
Year 1$16.7M+$4.4M$21.1M17.0%
Year 2$17.2M+$6.5M$23.7M19.1%
Year 3$17.7M+$6.5M$24.3M19.5%
Year 4$18.3M+$6.5M$24.8M20.0%
Year 5$18.8M+$6.5M$25.3M20.4%
$162.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$278.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$116.5M
Value Created
$25.3M
Exit EBITDA
$25.8M
Organic Growth
$65.3M
RCM Value Creation
$25.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.5M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$755K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$40K$60K$79K$95K
Total$3.3M$4.9M$6.5M$7.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 118 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.1%-6.5%5.3%15.4%
P70
Net-to-Gross10.4%11.3%18.7%35.0%
P20
Occupancy61.9%50.9%63.8%75.4%
P46
Rev/Bed$1.0M$381K$860K$1.3M
P57
Exp/Bed$892K$405K$833K$1.1M
P53

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML