Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF TAMPA 2026-04-26 17:19 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF TAMPA
CCN 100206 | FL | 257 beds | Current EBITDA $15.4M → Pro Forma $24.9M (+$9.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$180.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$15.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$24.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$9.5M
Modeled Uplift
$5.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.7M (vs $9.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$116K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.6M$3.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.5M$99K$3.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$554K$1.6M$2.2M$6.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$116K$116K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$903K$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$894K$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$733K$1.5M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$58K$116K$116K$116K$116K$116K$116K
Cumulative$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.7M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.1x
9.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x
10.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
11.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
12.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.3x
Headroom (turns)
19%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 19% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.2x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$15.4M$15.4M8.5%
Year 1$15.9M+$6.3M$22.2M12.3%
Year 2$16.4M+$9.5M$25.9M14.3%
Year 3$16.8M+$9.5M$26.3M14.6%
Year 4$17.4M+$9.5M$26.9M14.9%
Year 5$17.9M+$9.5M$27.4M15.2%
$154.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$301.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$146.9M
Value Created
$27.4M
Exit EBITDA
$24.6M
Organic Growth
$95.0M
RCM Value Creation
$27.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M
Clean Claim Rate$58K$87K$116K$139K
Total$4.8M$7.1M$9.5M$11.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 109 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.5%-5.2%2.8%17.2%
P58
Net-to-Gross9.8%9.9%14.1%20.5%
P21
Occupancy22.5%52.5%64.3%75.3%
P1
Rev/Bed$703K$827K$1.2M$1.4M
P18
Exp/Bed$643K$752K$970K$1.3M
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML