ML Analysis — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF TAMPA
CCN 100206 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Hold / Selective — investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.
54
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health15/25
RCM Upside9/25
Market Position17/20
Demand Defensibility10/15
Operational Efficiency3/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
- Low occupancy (<30%) — demand risk
Catalysts:
- Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
- Limited competition supports pricing power
- Volume growth opportunity from low occupancy
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
-2.2%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: 8.5%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-30.5%, 26.1%]. P56 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense/Bed | 642711.693 | +0.1250 | Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Revenue/Bed | 702702.467 | -0.1224 | Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| State Peer Margin | 0.032 | +0.0578 | Higher State Peer Margin increases predicted margi | |
| Reimbursement Quality | 0.070 | +0.0377 | Higher Reimbursement Quality increases predicted m | |
| Net-to-Gross | 0.098 | -0.0304 | Lower Net-to-Gross decreases predicted margin |
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
52.8%
Distress Risk
$6.4M
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
12.1%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital
Percentile within cluster: P76. Community hospitals — the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| PROMEDICA HICKMAN HOSPITAL | MI | 58 |
| WATAUGA MEDICAL CENTER | NC | 95 |
| ST LUKES HOSPITAL - EASTON CAMPUS | PA | 29 |
| CULPEPER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | VA | 70 |
| SOUTHSIDE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL | VA | 80 |
| SPECTRUM HEALTH LUDINGTON | MI | 45 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: High
National distress rate: 49.3%
FL distress rate: 30.3%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Rate | 0.225 | +0.279 | ▲ risk |
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.098 | -0.121 | ▼ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.015 | -0.074 | ▼ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 702702.467 | +0.052 | ▲ risk |
| Beds | 257.000 | +0.014 | ▲ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.263 | -0.011 | ▼ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $6.4M
Current margin: 8.5%
Projected margin: 12.1%
Grade: D
Comps: 108
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Improvement | 0.225 | 0.754 | 52.8% | $3.5M | 55% | 24mo |
| Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement | 0.098 | 0.205 | 10.7% | $2.3M | 65% | 18mo |
| Payer Mix Optimization | 0.722 | 0.767 | 4.5% | $668K | 50% | 24mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 26.0 | [25.0, 75.0] | P34 | Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |