Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. PETERSBURG GENERAL 2026-04-26 12:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. PETERSBURG GENERAL
CCN 100180 | FL | 168 beds | Current EBITDA $26.6M → Pro Forma $32.0M (+$5.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$102.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$26.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$32.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$5.4M
Modeled Uplift
$3.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.4M (vs $5.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$66K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.1M$2.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.0M$56K$2.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$315K$934K$1.2M$3.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$66K$66K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT23.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$513K$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$508K$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$416K$833K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$33K$66K$66K$66K$66K$66K$66K
Cumulative$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$26.6M$26.6M25.9%
Year 1$27.4M+$3.6M$31.0M30.2%
Year 2$28.2M+$5.4M$33.6M32.7%
Year 3$29.1M+$5.4M$34.5M33.6%
Year 4$29.9M+$5.4M$35.3M34.4%
Year 5$30.8M+$5.4M$36.2M35.3%
$266.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$398.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$132.6M
Value Created
$36.2M
Exit EBITDA
$42.4M
Organic Growth
$54.0M
RCM Value Creation
$36.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$625K$937K$1.2M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$33K$49K$66K$79K
Total$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$6.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 125 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin25.9%-6.2%2.8%15.6%
P89
Net-to-Gross6.4%10.2%16.3%23.8%
P0
Occupancy39.5%51.2%64.1%75.3%
P12
Rev/Bed$611K$629K$1.0M$1.3M
P23
Exp/Bed$453K$630K$920K$1.2M
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML