Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH FLORIDA BAPTIST HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH FLORIDA BAPTIST HOSPITAL
CCN 100132 | FL | 128 beds | Current EBITDA $4.2M → Pro Forma $12.9M (+$8.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$164.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$8.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$8.6M
Modeled Uplift
$6.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.0M (vs $8.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$105K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$8.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.3M$3.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.2M$90K$3.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$504K$1.5M$2.0M$6.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$105K$105K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$821K$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$813K$1.6M$2.4M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$666K$1.3M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$53K$105K$105K$105K$105K$105K$105K
Cumulative$0$2.4M$4.7M$7.0M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $8.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x82% / 20.1x87% / 22.7x91% / 25.3x93% / 26.6x95% / 27.9x
9.0x77% / 17.5x82% / 19.8x86% / 22.1x88% / 23.3x89% / 24.4x
10.0x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.5x81% / 19.6x83% / 20.6x85% / 21.7x
11.0x69% / 13.7x73% / 15.6x77% / 17.5x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.4x
12.0x65% / 12.3x70% / 14.1x74% / 15.8x75% / 16.6x77% / 17.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.7x
Headroom (turns)
57%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 57% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.8x, adding 5.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.2M$4.2M2.6%
Year 1$4.4M+$5.8M$10.1M6.2%
Year 2$4.5M+$8.6M$13.1M8.0%
Year 3$4.6M+$8.6M$13.3M8.1%
Year 4$4.8M+$8.6M$13.4M8.2%
Year 5$4.9M+$8.6M$13.6M8.3%
$42.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$149.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$106.7M
Value Created
$13.6M
Exit EBITDA
$6.8M
Organic Growth
$86.4M
RCM Value Creation
$13.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$3.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.6M$2.4M$3.3M$3.9M
A/R Days Reduction$999K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$53K$79K$105K$126K
Total$4.3M$6.5M$8.6M$10.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 123 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.6%-5.4%5.0%15.8%
P43
Net-to-Gross21.2%10.6%18.5%34.0%
P61
Occupancy59.9%50.7%63.8%75.4%
P43
Rev/Bed$1.3M$400K$850K$1.3M
P78
Exp/Bed$1.2M$425K$808K$1.1M
P80

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML