ML Analysis — SOUTH FLORIDA BAPTIST HOSPITAL
CCN 100132 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Hold / Selective — investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.
51
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health13/25
RCM Upside14/25
Market Position13/20
Demand Defensibility8/15
Operational Efficiency3/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
Catalysts:
- RCM optimization could add 3-5pp margin
- Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
1.2%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: 2.6%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-27.1%, 29.5%]. P65 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| State Peer Margin | 0.032 | +0.0578 | Higher State Peer Margin increases predicted margi | |
| Expense/Bed | 1249208.742 | +0.0503 | Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Revenue/Bed | 1282371.672 | -0.0414 | Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| Net-to-Gross | 0.212 | -0.0176 | Lower Net-to-Gross decreases predicted margin | |
| Reimbursement Quality | 0.141 | +0.0176 | Higher Reimbursement Quality increases predicted m |
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
46.9%
Distress Risk
$5.0M
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
5.6%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital
Percentile within cluster: P33. Community hospitals — the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| CLARA MAASS MEDICAL CENTER | NJ | 259 |
| PRESENCE SAINTS MARY & ELIZABETH MED | IL | 266 |
| ADVENTIST HEALTH BAKERSFIELD | CA | 254 |
| BRISTOL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | TN | 244 |
| HOLSTON VALLEY HOSP & MED CTR | TN | 286 |
| SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | OH | 230 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: Elevated
National distress rate: 49.3%
FL distress rate: 30.3%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.212 | -0.070 | ▼ risk |
| Occupancy Rate | 0.599 | -0.068 | ▼ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.139 | +0.050 | ▲ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.197 | -0.022 | ▼ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 1282371.672 | +0.018 | ▲ risk |
| Beds | 128.000 | -0.003 | ▼ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $5.0M
Current margin: 2.6%
Projected margin: 5.6%
Grade: D
Comps: 122
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement | 0.212 | 0.340 | 12.8% | $2.5M | 65% | 18mo |
| Payer Mix Optimization | 0.664 | 0.763 | 9.9% | $1.5M | 50% | 24mo |
| Occupancy Improvement | 0.599 | 0.754 | 15.5% | $1.0M | 55% | 24mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 25.8 | [25.0, 75.0] | P33 | Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |