Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 100012 | FL | 748 beds | Current EBITDA $222.1M → Pro Forma $289.3M (+$67.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.28B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$222.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$67.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$289.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$49.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$67.1M
Modeled Uplift
$43.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$23.4M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $43.7M (vs $67.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$25.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$25.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$15.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$817K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$67.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$25.5M$25.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$24.6M$702K$25.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.9M$11.6M$15.5M$49.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$817K$817K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT22.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.4M$12.8M$19.1M$25.5M$25.5M$25.5M$25.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.3M$12.6M$19.0M$25.3M$25.3M$25.3M$25.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.2M$10.4M$15.5M$15.5M$15.5M$15.5M$15.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$408K$817K$817K$817K$817K$817K$817K
Cumulative$0$18.3M$36.6M$54.4M$67.1M$67.1M$67.1M$67.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $67.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
9.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
10.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.0x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$222.1M$222.1M17.4%
Year 1$228.8M+$44.8M$273.6M21.4%
Year 2$235.7M+$67.1M$302.8M23.7%
Year 3$242.7M+$67.1M$309.9M24.3%
Year 4$250.0M+$67.1M$317.2M24.8%
Year 5$257.5M+$67.1M$324.7M25.4%
$2.22B
Entry EV (10x)
$3.57B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.35B
Value Created
$324.7M
Exit EBITDA
$353.8M
Organic Growth
$671.5M
RCM Value Creation
$324.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$12.8M$19.1M$25.5M$30.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$12.6M$19.0M$25.3M$30.3M
A/R Days Reduction$7.8M$11.6M$15.5M$18.6M
Clean Claim Rate$408K$613K$817K$980K
Total$33.6M$50.4M$67.1M$80.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.4%-5.3%5.7%12.5%
P78
Net-to-Gross21.4%14.4%19.0%22.1%
P67
Occupancy65.6%60.2%67.4%75.0%
P38
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.1M$1.3M$1.8M
P67
Exp/Bed$1.4M$1.0M$1.2M$1.6M
P65

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML