Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SPECIALTY HOSPITAL OF WASHINGTON 2026-04-26 12:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SPECIALTY HOSPITAL OF WASHINGTON
CCN 092002 | DC | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $8.3M → Pro Forma $11.6M (+$3.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$62.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$3.3M
Modeled Uplift
$2.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$958K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.3M (vs $3.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$758K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$40K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$34K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$191K$567K$758K$2.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$40K$40K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$311K$623K$934K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$308K$617K$925K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$253K$505K$758K$758K$758K$758K$758K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K
Cumulative$0$892K$1.8M$2.7M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.4x60% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
9.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
11.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.3M$8.3M13.3%
Year 1$8.5M+$2.2M$10.7M17.2%
Year 2$8.8M+$3.3M$12.1M19.4%
Year 3$9.1M+$3.3M$12.3M19.8%
Year 4$9.3M+$3.3M$12.6M20.2%
Year 5$9.6M+$3.3M$12.9M20.7%
$82.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$141.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$58.8M
Value Created
$12.9M
Exit EBITDA
$13.2M
Organic Growth
$32.8M
RCM Value Creation
$12.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$623K$934K$1.2M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$617K$925K$1.2M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$379K$568K$758K$910K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$30K$40K$48K
Total$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$3.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 2150 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.3%-16.3%-2.9%9.0%
P82
Net-to-Gross67.4%22.3%32.1%45.0%
P93
Occupancy68.4%33.9%53.8%72.3%
P70
Rev/Bed$1.0M$380K$680K$1.6M
P61
Exp/Bed$900K$386K$727K$1.6M
P55

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML