Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MOUNT SINAI REHABILITATION HOSPTIAL 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MOUNT SINAI REHABILITATION HOSPTIAL
CCN 073025 | CT | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.2M → Pro Forma $-905K (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-905K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$920K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$842K
Risk-Adjusted
-$420K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$480K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$475K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$292K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$480K$480K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$462K$13K$475K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$74K$218K$292K$920K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$120K$240K$360K$480K$480K$480K$480K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$119K$237K$356K$475K$475K$475K$475K
A/R Days Reduction$0$97K$195K$292K$292K$292K$292K$292K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$344K$687K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.2M$-2.2M-9.0%
Year 1$-2.2M+$841K$-1.4M-5.8%
Year 2$-2.3M+$1.3M$-1.0M-4.3%
Year 3$-2.4M+$1.3M$-1.1M-4.6%
Year 4$-2.4M+$1.3M$-1.2M-4.9%
Year 5$-2.5M+$1.3M$-1.2M-5.2%
$-21.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-13.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.9M
Value Created
$-1.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-3.5M
Organic Growth
$12.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$240K$360K$480K$576K
Denial Rate Reductio$237K$356K$475K$570K
A/R Days Reduction$146K$219K$292K$350K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$15K$18K
Total$631K$946K$1.3M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 12 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.0%-29.3%-15.2%-9.8%
P70
Net-to-Gross29.4%29.6%36.2%37.7%
P20
Occupancy51.2%32.6%56.4%75.3%
P42
Rev/Bed$400K$712K$1.2M$1.7M
P10
Exp/Bed$436K$917K$1.3M$1.8M
P8

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML