Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CLEAR VIEW BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 2026-04-26 10:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CLEAR VIEW BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
CCN 064027 | CO | 92 beds | Current EBITDA $290K → Pro Forma $494K (+$204K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$3.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$290K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$204K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$494K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+563bps
Margin Improvement
$139K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$204K
Modeled Uplift
$122K
Risk-Adjusted
-$82K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.1M (vs $0.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$78K
+215bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$72K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$44K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+27bp
Total EBITDA Impact$204K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$70K$8K$78K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$72K$72K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$11K$33K$44K$139K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$19K$39K$58K$78K$78K$78K$78K
Cost to Collect$0$18K$36K$54K$72K$72K$72K$72K
A/R Days Reduction$0$15K$29K$44K$44K$44K$44K$44K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$57K$114K$166K$204K$204K$204K$204K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $204K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.2x72% / 14.9x
9.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x
10.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
11.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x
12.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
24%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 24% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$290K$290K8.0%
Year 1$298K+$136K$434K12.0%
Year 2$307K+$204K$511K14.1%
Year 3$316K+$204K$520K14.4%
Year 4$326K+$204K$530K14.6%
Year 5$336K+$204K$540K14.9%
$2.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$5.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.0M
Value Created
$540K
Exit EBITDA
$461K
Organic Growth
$2.0M
RCM Value Creation
$540K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$39K$58K$78K$94K
Cost to Collect$36K$54K$72K$87K
A/R Days Reduction$22K$33K$44K$53K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$102K$153K$204K$245K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-9.8%-1.7%5.6%
P0
Net-to-Gross31.0%20.4%29.6%37.0%
P57
Occupancy20.0%43.6%63.3%75.7%
P3
Rev/Bed$39K$335K$1.7M$2.2M
P3
Exp/Bed$96K$417K$1.5M$2.2M
P0

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML