Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KREMMLING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DISTRICT 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KREMMLING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DISTRICT
CCN 061318 | CO | 22 beds | Current EBITDA $283K → Pro Forma $2.9M (+$2.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$50.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$283K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$2.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$910K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$990K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$609K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$32K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$963K$28K$990K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$153K$455K$609K$1.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$32K$32K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$250K$500K$750K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$248K$495K$743K$990K$990K$990K$990K
A/R Days Reduction$0$203K$406K$609K$609K$609K$609K$609K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K
Cumulative$0$717K$1.4M$2.1M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x136% / 73.3x141% / 81.8x146% / 90.3x148% / 94.6x151% / 98.8x
9.0x130% / 64.8x135% / 72.4x140% / 79.9x142% / 83.7x145% / 87.5x
10.0x125% / 58.0x130% / 64.8x135% / 71.6x137% / 75.0x139% / 78.4x
11.0x121% / 52.4x126% / 58.6x130% / 64.8x132% / 67.9x135% / 71.0x
12.0x117% / 47.8x122% / 53.5x126% / 59.1x128% / 62.0x130% / 64.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.7x
Headroom (turns)
87%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 87% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.8x, adding 7.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$283K$283K0.6%
Year 1$291K+$1.8M$2.0M4.1%
Year 2$300K+$2.6M$2.9M5.9%
Year 3$309K+$2.6M$2.9M5.9%
Year 4$318K+$2.6M$2.9M5.9%
Year 5$328K+$2.6M$3.0M5.9%
$2.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$32.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$29.7M
Value Created
$3.0M
Exit EBITDA
$450K
Organic Growth
$26.3M
RCM Value Creation
$3.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$500K$750K$1.0M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$495K$743K$990K$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$304K$457K$609K$730K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$24K$32K$38K
Total$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.6%-13.8%-5.6%3.0%
P70
Net-to-Gross60.9%38.4%49.6%64.0%
P66
Occupancy37.3%21.8%31.3%53.1%
P58
Rev/Bed$2.3M$776K$1.8M$3.1M
P60
Exp/Bed$2.3M$906K$1.9M$3.0M
P60

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML