Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WRAY COMMUNITY DISTRICT HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:10 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WRAY COMMUNITY DISTRICT HOSPITAL
CCN 061309 | CO | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $1.4M → Pro Forma $3.1M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$34.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$661K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$680K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$673K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$414K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$680K$680K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$654K$19K$673K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$104K$309K$414K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT67.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$170K$340K$510K$680K$680K$680K$680K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$168K$337K$505K$673K$673K$673K$673K
A/R Days Reduction$0$138K$276K$414K$414K$414K$414K$414K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$487K$974K$1.5M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x72% / 14.9x76% / 16.9x80% / 18.9x82% / 19.9x84% / 20.9x
9.0x67% / 12.8x71% / 14.6x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.3x79% / 18.2x
10.0x62% / 11.2x67% / 12.8x71% / 14.5x72% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x
11.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x
12.0x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.8x
Headroom (turns)
44%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 44% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.7x, adding 4.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.4M$1.4M4.0%
Year 1$1.4M+$1.2M$2.6M7.6%
Year 2$1.4M+$1.8M$3.2M9.5%
Year 3$1.5M+$1.8M$3.3M9.6%
Year 4$1.5M+$1.8M$3.3M9.8%
Year 5$1.6M+$1.8M$3.4M9.9%
$13.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$37.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$23.4M
Value Created
$3.4M
Exit EBITDA
$2.2M
Organic Growth
$17.9M
RCM Value Creation
$3.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$340K$510K$680K$816K
Denial Rate Reductio$337K$505K$673K$808K
A/R Days Reduction$207K$310K$414K$496K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$894K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 39 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.0%-19.4%-5.1%1.7%
P82
Net-to-Gross61.2%44.3%55.2%67.3%
P62
Occupancy22.5%20.9%28.9%45.5%
P31
Rev/Bed$2.1M$1.3M$2.0M$3.0M
P56
Exp/Bed$2.0M$1.5M$2.0M$3.0M
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML