Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UCHEALTH GRANDVIEW HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UCHEALTH GRANDVIEW HOSPITAL
CCN 060130 | CO | 22 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.7M → Pro Forma $-3.4M (+$2.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$43.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$2.3M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$870K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$870K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$861K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$529K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$28K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$870K$870K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$837K$24K$861K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$133K$396K$529K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$28K$28K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$217K$435K$652K$870K$870K$870K$870K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$215K$431K$646K$861K$861K$861K$861K
A/R Days Reduction$0$176K$353K$529K$529K$529K$529K$529K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K
Cumulative$0$623K$1.2M$1.9M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.7M$-5.7M-13.2%
Year 1$-5.9M+$1.5M$-4.4M-10.1%
Year 2$-6.1M+$2.3M$-3.8M-8.7%
Year 3$-6.3M+$2.3M$-4.0M-9.1%
Year 4$-6.4M+$2.3M$-4.2M-9.6%
Year 5$-6.6M+$2.3M$-4.4M-10.0%
$-57.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-47.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.4M
Value Created
$-4.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-9.1M
Organic Growth
$22.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$435K$652K$870K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$431K$646K$861K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$265K$397K$529K$635K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$21K$28K$33K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-13.2%-13.8%-5.6%3.0%
P26
Net-to-Gross14.1%38.4%49.6%64.0%
P2
Occupancy15.6%21.8%31.3%53.1%
P10
Rev/Bed$2.0M$776K$1.8M$3.1M
P52
Exp/Bed$2.2M$906K$1.9M$3.0M
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML