Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UCHEALTH BROOMFIELD HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UCHEALTH BROOMFIELD HOSPITAL
CCN 060129 | CO | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.1M → Pro Forma $-1.9M (+$3.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$60.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$3.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$999K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.2M (vs $3.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$734K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$39K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$33K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$185K$549K$734K$2.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$39K$39K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT65.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$302K$603K$905K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$298K$597K$895K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$245K$489K$734K$734K$734K$734K$734K
Clean Claim Rate$0$19K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K
Cumulative$0$864K$1.7M$2.6M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.1M$-5.1M-8.5%
Year 1$-5.3M+$2.1M$-3.1M-5.2%
Year 2$-5.4M+$3.2M$-2.2M-3.7%
Year 3$-5.6M+$3.2M$-2.4M-4.0%
Year 4$-5.7M+$3.2M$-2.6M-4.3%
Year 5$-5.9M+$3.2M$-2.7M-4.5%
$-51.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-30.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.9M
Value Created
$-2.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-8.1M
Organic Growth
$31.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$603K$905K$1.2M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$597K$895K$1.2M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$367K$550K$734K$881K
Clean Claim Rate$19K$29K$39K$46K
Total$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 47 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.5%-14.9%-5.8%2.9%
P32
Net-to-Gross18.4%41.2%50.8%65.2%
P2
Occupancy39.4%21.6%30.6%48.4%
P64
Rev/Bed$3.0M$794K$1.8M$3.0M
P72
Exp/Bed$3.3M$965K$1.8M$2.8M
P79

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML