Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CENTURA ST. ANTHONY NORTH HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 07:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CENTURA ST. ANTHONY NORTH HOSPITAL
CCN 060104 | CO | 118 beds | Current EBITDA $29.4M → Pro Forma $43.5M (+$14.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$268.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$29.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$43.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$14.1M
Modeled Uplift
$10.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.1M (vs $14.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$172K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.4M$5.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.2M$148K$5.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$823K$2.4M$3.3M$10.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$172K$172K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$86K$172K$172K$172K$172K$172K$172K
Cumulative$0$3.8M$7.7M$11.4M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.7x
9.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x
10.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
11.0x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
12.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.8x
Headroom (turns)
12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.7x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$29.4M$29.4M10.9%
Year 1$30.2M+$9.4M$39.7M14.8%
Year 2$31.2M+$14.1M$45.3M16.9%
Year 3$32.1M+$14.1M$46.2M17.2%
Year 4$33.1M+$14.1M$47.2M17.6%
Year 5$34.0M+$14.1M$48.2M17.9%
$293.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$529.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$236.1M
Value Created
$48.2M
Exit EBITDA
$46.8M
Organic Growth
$141.2M
RCM Value Creation
$48.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$6.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.7M$4.0M$5.3M$6.4M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.4M$3.3M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$86K$129K$172K$206K
Total$7.1M$10.6M$14.1M$16.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 35 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.9%-10.0%-1.7%7.5%
P85
Net-to-Gross17.0%19.7%28.1%35.6%
P6
Occupancy64.2%55.5%64.2%77.6%
P49
Rev/Bed$2.3M$335K$1.6M$2.1M
P83
Exp/Bed$2.0M$401K$1.5M$2.1M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML