Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE MEDICAL CENTER OF AURORA 2026-04-26 07:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE MEDICAL CENTER OF AURORA
CCN 060100 | CO | 333 beds | Current EBITDA $40.6M → Pro Forma $62.5M (+$21.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$415.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$40.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$21.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$62.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$21.9M
Modeled Uplift
$15.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.1M (vs $21.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$266K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$21.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.3M$8.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.0M$229K$8.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.8M$5.1M$16.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$266K$266K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT26.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.2M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.1M$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$133K$266K$266K$266K$266K$266K$266K
Cumulative$0$6.0M$11.9M$17.7M$21.9M$21.9M$21.9M$21.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $21.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x
9.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
10.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x
11.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x
12.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.0x
Headroom (turns)
15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.5x, adding 3.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$40.6M$40.6M9.8%
Year 1$41.8M+$14.6M$56.4M13.6%
Year 2$43.0M+$21.9M$64.9M15.6%
Year 3$44.3M+$21.9M$66.2M15.9%
Year 4$45.7M+$21.9M$67.5M16.2%
Year 5$47.0M+$21.9M$68.9M16.6%
$405.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$758.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$352.3M
Value Created
$68.9M
Exit EBITDA
$64.6M
Organic Growth
$218.8M
RCM Value Creation
$68.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.2M$6.2M$8.3M$10.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$9.9M
A/R Days Reduction$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M
Clean Claim Rate$133K$200K$266K$319K
Total$10.9M$16.4M$21.9M$26.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 21 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.8%-8.1%1.2%10.8%
P67
Net-to-Gross9.5%12.8%18.0%26.6%
P5
Occupancy66.1%62.7%66.8%75.8%
P43
Rev/Bed$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M$2.3M
P5
Exp/Bed$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M$2.2M
P10

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML