Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AURORA CHARTER OAK BHS 2026-04-26 17:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AURORA CHARTER OAK BHS
CCN 054069 | CA | 134 beds | Current EBITDA $-716K → Pro Forma $1.8M (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$48.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-716K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$657K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.9M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$961K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$951K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$585K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$31K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$961K$961K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$925K$26K$951K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$147K$437K$585K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$31K$31K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$240K$480K$721K$961K$961K$961K$961K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$238K$476K$713K$951K$951K$951K$951K
A/R Days Reduction$0$195K$390K$585K$585K$585K$585K$585K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K
Cumulative$0$688K$1.4M$2.0M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-3.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
9.8x
Headroom (turns)
151%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 151% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -3.3x, adding 102.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-716K$-716K-1.5%
Year 1$-737K+$1.7M$948K2.0%
Year 2$-759K+$2.5M$1.8M3.7%
Year 3$-782K+$2.5M$1.7M3.6%
Year 4$-805K+$2.5M$1.7M3.6%
Year 5$-829K+$2.5M$1.7M3.5%
$-7.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$18.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$25.8M
Value Created
$1.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-1.1M
Organic Growth
$25.3M
RCM Value Creation
$1.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$480K$721K$961K$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$476K$713K$951K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$292K$438K$585K$702K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$23K$31K$37K
Total$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 194 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.5%-18.1%-3.6%4.7%
P58
Net-to-Gross59.8%18.0%22.4%29.3%
P95
Occupancy96.5%44.8%57.8%72.2%
P99
Rev/Bed$359K$624K$1.1M$2.2M
P8
Exp/Bed$364K$682K$1.4M$2.3M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML