Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS HOSP & RES CNTR OAKLAND 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHILDRENS HOSP & RES CNTR OAKLAND
CCN 053301 | CA | 155 beds | Current EBITDA $-48.5M → Pro Forma $-12.3M (+$36.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$687.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-48.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$36.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-12.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$26.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$36.2M
Modeled Uplift
$27.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.9M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $27.2M (vs $36.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$440K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$36.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.8M$13.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.2M$378K$13.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.1M$6.3M$8.4M$26.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$440K$440K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.4M$6.9M$10.3M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.4M$6.8M$10.2M$13.6M$13.6M$13.6M$13.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$220K$440K$440K$440K$440K$440K$440K
Cumulative$0$9.9M$19.7M$29.3M$36.2M$36.2M$36.2M$36.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $36.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-48.5M$-48.5M-7.1%
Year 1$-50.0M+$24.1M$-25.8M-3.8%
Year 2$-51.5M+$36.2M$-15.3M-2.2%
Year 3$-53.0M+$36.2M$-16.8M-2.4%
Year 4$-54.6M+$36.2M$-18.4M-2.7%
Year 5$-56.2M+$36.2M$-20.1M-2.9%
$-485.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-220.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$264.6M
Value Created
$-20.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-77.3M
Organic Growth
$361.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-20.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.9M$10.3M$13.8M$16.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.8M$10.2M$13.6M$16.3M
A/R Days Reduction$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$10.0M
Clean Claim Rate$220K$330K$440K$528K
Total$18.1M$27.1M$36.2M$43.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 201 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.1%-17.4%-4.0%4.5%
P44
Net-to-Gross35.5%17.9%22.3%28.8%
P85
Occupancy69.3%45.9%59.7%72.7%
P64
Rev/Bed$4.4M$717K$1.4M$2.2M
P98
Exp/Bed$4.8M$776K$1.5M$2.4M
P98

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML