Bridge Realization Estimate
ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)
Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.6M (vs $7.3M modeled).
EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers
Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).
Lever Detail
Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.
| Lever | Current | Target | Revenue | Cost | EBITDA | WC | Ramp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | 4.5% DEFAULT | 2.5% BENCHMARK | $0 | $2.8M | $2.8M | $0 | 12mo |
| Denial Rate Reduction | 12.0% DEFAULT | 6.5% BENCHMARK | $2.7M | $76K | $2.7M | $0 | 12mo |
| A/R Days Reduction | 52.00 DEFAULT | 38.00 BENCHMARK | $423K | $1.3M | $1.7M | $5.3M | 9mo |
| Clean Claim Rate | 88.0% DEFAULT | 96.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $88K | $88K | $0 | 6mo |
| Net Collection Rate | 93.5% DEFAULT | 29.2% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
| CDI / Case Mix Index | 135.0% DEFAULT | 142.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
Implementation Timing Curve
Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.
| Lever | M0 | M3 | M6 | M9 | M12 | M18 | M24 | M36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $0 | $690K | $1.4M | $2.1M | $2.8M | $2.8M | $2.8M | $2.8M |
| Denial Rate Reduction | $0 | $683K | $1.4M | $2.0M | $2.7M | $2.7M | $2.7M | $2.7M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $0 | $560K | $1.1M | $1.7M | $1.7M | $1.7M | $1.7M | $1.7M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $0 | $44K | $88K | $88K | $88K | $88K | $88K | $88K |
| Cumulative | $0 | $2.0M | $4.0M | $5.9M | $7.3M | $7.3M | $7.3M | $7.3M |
Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)
5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.3M is added at exit.
| Entry \ Exit | 9.0x | 10.0x | 11.0x | 11.5x | 12.0x |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0x | 62% / 11.2x | 67% / 12.8x | 71% / 14.4x | 72% / 15.2x | 74% / 16.1x |
| 9.0x | 57% / 9.6x | 62% / 11.1x | 66% / 12.5x | 68% / 13.2x | 69% / 13.9x |
| 10.0x | 53% / 8.3x | 57% / 9.6x | 61% / 10.9x | 63% / 11.6x | 65% / 12.2x |
| 11.0x | 49% / 7.3x | 53% / 8.4x | 57% / 9.6x | 59% / 10.2x | 61% / 10.8x |
| 12.0x | 45% / 6.4x | 50% / 7.5x | 54% / 8.6x | 55% / 9.1x | 57% / 9.6x |
Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)
Pro forma EBITDA can decline 28% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.6x, adding 3.8 turns of cushion.
5-Year Value Creation Waterfall
EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).
| Base EBITDA | RCM Uplift | Total | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | $8.8M | — | $8.8M | 6.4% |
| Year 1 | $9.1M | +$4.8M | $14.0M | 10.1% |
| Year 2 | $9.4M | +$7.3M | $16.6M | 12.1% |
| Year 3 | $9.7M | +$7.3M | $16.9M | 12.3% |
| Year 4 | $10.0M | +$7.3M | $17.2M | 12.5% |
| Year 5 | $10.3M | +$7.3M | $17.5M | 12.7% |
Achievement Sensitivity
What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.
| Lever | 50% | 75% | 100% | 120% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $1.4M | $2.1M | $2.8M | $3.3M |
| Denial Rate Reductio | $1.4M | $2.0M | $2.7M | $3.3M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $839K | $1.3M | $1.7M | $2.0M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $44K | $66K | $88K | $106K |
| Total | $3.6M | $5.4M | $7.3M | $8.7M |
Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits
Key metrics vs 199 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.
| Metric | Hospital | P25 | P50 | P75 | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Op Margin | 6.4% | -18.2% | -4.0% | 4.7% | P80 |
| Net-to-Gross | 27.8% | 18.1% | 22.7% | 29.2% | P67 |
| Occupancy | 95.4% | 44.7% | 58.2% | 72.2% | P98 |
| Rev/Bed | $1000K | $665K | $1.2M | $2.2M | P42 |
| Exp/Bed | $936K | $691K | $1.5M | $2.4M | P34 |
Bridge Methodology
Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.