Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL SAN FRANCISCO 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL SAN FRANCISCO
CCN 052034 | CA | 99 beds | Current EBITDA $-13.1M → Pro Forma $-10.2M (+$2.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$55.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-13.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-10.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$2.9M
Modeled Uplift
$2.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$926K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.0M (vs $2.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$677K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$36K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$31K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$171K$506K$677K$2.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$36K$36K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$278K$556K$834K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$275K$550K$826K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$226K$451K$677K$677K$677K$677K$677K
Clean Claim Rate$0$18K$36K$36K$36K$36K$36K$36K
Cumulative$0$797K$1.6M$2.4M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-13.1M$-13.1M-23.5%
Year 1$-13.5M+$1.9M$-11.5M-20.7%
Year 2$-13.9M+$2.9M$-11.0M-19.7%
Year 3$-14.3M+$2.9M$-11.4M-20.4%
Year 4$-14.7M+$2.9M$-11.8M-21.2%
Year 5$-15.2M+$2.9M$-12.2M-22.0%
$-130.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-134.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$-3.8M
Value Created
$-12.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-20.8M
Organic Growth
$29.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-12.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$556K$834K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$550K$826K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$338K$507K$677K$812K
Clean Claim Rate$18K$27K$36K$43K
Total$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 169 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-23.5%-20.5%-4.6%4.4%
P23
Net-to-Gross21.6%18.0%23.4%35.5%
P39
Occupancy60.9%43.9%57.2%73.4%
P57
Rev/Bed$562K$511K$934K$2.1M
P29
Exp/Bed$694K$575K$1.1M$2.2M
P36

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML