Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — VIBRA HOSPITAL OF SACRAMENTO 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — VIBRA HOSPITAL OF SACRAMENTO
CCN 052033 | CA | 58 beds | Current EBITDA $1.9M → Pro Forma $4.1M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$42.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$582K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$848K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$840K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$516K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$27K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$848K$848K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$816K$23K$840K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$130K$386K$516K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$27K$27K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$212K$424K$636K$848K$848K$848K$848K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$210K$420K$630K$840K$840K$840K$840K
A/R Days Reduction$0$172K$344K$516K$516K$516K$516K$516K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K
Cumulative$0$607K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x70% / 14.0x74% / 15.9x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.8x82% / 19.7x
9.0x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.3x77% / 17.2x
10.0x60% / 10.5x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.4x72% / 15.1x
11.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x
12.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.7x
Headroom (turns)
41%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 41% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.8x, adding 4.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.9M$1.9M4.4%
Year 1$1.9M+$1.5M$3.4M8.0%
Year 2$2.0M+$2.2M$4.2M9.9%
Year 3$2.0M+$2.2M$4.3M10.1%
Year 4$2.1M+$2.2M$4.3M10.2%
Year 5$2.2M+$2.2M$4.4M10.3%
$18.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$48.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$29.7M
Value Created
$4.4M
Exit EBITDA
$3.0M
Organic Growth
$22.3M
RCM Value Creation
$4.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$424K$636K$848K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$420K$630K$840K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$258K$387K$516K$619K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$20K$27K$33K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 118 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.4%-21.2%-5.9%1.9%
P80
Net-to-Gross21.3%20.3%25.8%38.3%
P29
Occupancy84.5%40.2%56.3%71.2%
P91
Rev/Bed$731K$500K$770K$1.9M
P47
Exp/Bed$699K$529K$820K$2.0M
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML