Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BROADVIEW INC. 2026-04-26 14:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BROADVIEW INC.
CCN 051991 | CA | 27 beds | Current EBITDA $122K → Pro Forma $218K (+$96K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$122K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$96K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$218K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+632bps
Margin Improvement
$58K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

57%
Realization (C)
$96K
Modeled Uplift
$55K
Risk-Adjusted
-$41K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 57% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.1M (vs $0.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$38K
+247bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$30K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$18K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+63bp
Total EBITDA Impact$96K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$29K$8K$38K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$30K$30K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$5K$14K$18K$58K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$9K$19K$28K$38K$38K$38K$38K
Cost to Collect$0$8K$15K$23K$30K$30K$30K$30K
A/R Days Reduction$0$6K$12K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$28K$56K$79K$96K$96K$96K$96K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $96K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x
9.0x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x
10.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
11.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
12.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.8x
Headroom (turns)
27%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 27% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.7x, adding 3.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$122K$122K8.0%
Year 1$125K+$64K$189K12.5%
Year 2$129K+$96K$225K14.8%
Year 3$133K+$96K$229K15.1%
Year 4$137K+$96K$233K15.3%
Year 5$141K+$96K$237K15.6%
$1.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.4M
Value Created
$237K
Exit EBITDA
$194K
Organic Growth
$960K
RCM Value Creation
$237K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$19K$28K$38K$45K
Cost to Collect$15K$23K$30K$36K
A/R Days Reduction$9K$14K$18K$22K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$48K$72K$96K$115K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 69 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-16.8%-6.1%1.8%
P0
Net-to-Gross98.0%28.4%41.0%59.7%
P94
Occupancy19.8%29.5%44.0%67.2%
P13
Rev/Bed$56K$696K$1.9M$3.2M
P0
Exp/Bed$142K$872K$2.0M$3.2M
P0

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML