Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 051336 | CA | 13 beds | Current EBITDA $2.2M → Pro Forma $5.8M (+$3.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$67.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$3.6M
Modeled Uplift
$2.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$972K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.6M (vs $3.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$822K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$43K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.4M$1.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$37K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$207K$615K$822K$2.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$43K$43K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$338K$676K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$334K$669K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$274K$548K$822K$822K$822K$822K$822K
Clean Claim Rate$0$22K$43K$43K$43K$43K$43K$43K
Cumulative$0$968K$1.9M$2.9M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x76% / 16.9x80% / 19.1x84% / 21.4x86% / 22.5x88% / 23.6x
9.0x71% / 14.7x76% / 16.6x80% / 18.6x81% / 19.6x83% / 20.6x
10.0x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.7x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.3x79% / 18.2x
11.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 13.0x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.3x
12.0x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.7x67% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.2x
Headroom (turns)
50%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 50% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.3x, adding 5.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.2M$2.2M3.3%
Year 1$2.3M+$2.4M$4.7M6.9%
Year 2$2.4M+$3.6M$5.9M8.8%
Year 3$2.4M+$3.6M$6.0M8.9%
Year 4$2.5M+$3.6M$6.1M9.0%
Year 5$2.6M+$3.6M$6.1M9.1%
$22.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$67.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$45.2M
Value Created
$6.1M
Exit EBITDA
$3.5M
Organic Growth
$35.5M
RCM Value Creation
$6.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$676K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$669K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$411K$617K$822K$987K
Clean Claim Rate$22K$32K$43K$52K
Total$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.3%-22.5%-10.9%-0.2%
P80
Net-to-Gross35.9%31.6%45.9%63.8%
P36
Occupancy44.6%19.5%36.0%64.2%
P58
Rev/Bed$5.2M$1.1M$2.3M$3.9M
P82
Exp/Bed$5.0M$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M
P80

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML