Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SANTA YNEZ VALLEY COTTAGE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:10 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SANTA YNEZ VALLEY COTTAGE HOSPITAL
CCN 051331 | CA | 11 beds | Current EBITDA $291K → Pro Forma $1.5M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$291K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$916K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$769K
Risk-Adjusted
-$488K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$478K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$473K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$291K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$478K$478K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$460K$13K$473K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$73K$217K$291K$916K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT77.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$119K$239K$358K$478K$478K$478K$478K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$118K$237K$355K$473K$473K$473K$473K
A/R Days Reduction$0$97K$194K$291K$291K$291K$291K$291K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$342K$685K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x106% / 36.8x110% / 41.3x115% / 45.8x117% / 48.0x119% / 50.2x
9.0x100% / 32.4x105% / 36.3x109% / 40.3x111% / 42.3x113% / 44.3x
10.0x96% / 28.8x100% / 32.4x105% / 36.0x107% / 37.7x109% / 39.5x
11.0x92% / 25.9x96% / 29.1x100% / 32.4x102% / 34.0x104% / 35.6x
12.0x88% / 23.5x93% / 26.4x97% / 29.4x99% / 30.9x100% / 32.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.9x
Headroom (turns)
76%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 76% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.6x, adding 6.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$291K$291K1.2%
Year 1$300K+$838K$1.1M4.8%
Year 2$309K+$1.3M$1.6M6.6%
Year 3$318K+$1.3M$1.6M6.6%
Year 4$327K+$1.3M$1.6M6.6%
Year 5$337K+$1.3M$1.6M6.7%
$2.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$17.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.6M
Value Created
$1.6M
Exit EBITDA
$463K
Organic Growth
$12.6M
RCM Value Creation
$1.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$239K$358K$478K$573K
Denial Rate Reductio$237K$355K$473K$568K
A/R Days Reduction$145K$218K$291K$349K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$11K$15K$18K
Total$628K$943K$1.3M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 25 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.2%-50.0%-12.4%3.3%
P68
Net-to-Gross38.3%37.1%62.1%77.7%
P28
Occupancy7.7%13.8%26.8%60.5%
P8
Rev/Bed$2.2M$1.0M$2.2M$2.8M
P48
Exp/Bed$2.1M$1.1M$2.1M$3.9M
P52

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML