Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SUTTER SURGICAL HOSP - NORTH VALLEY 2026-04-26 15:52 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SUTTER SURGICAL HOSP - NORTH VALLEY
CCN 050766 | CA | 14 beds | Current EBITDA $1.1M → Pro Forma $2.8M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$31.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$634K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$623K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$617K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$379K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$20K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$623K$623K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$600K$17K$617K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$96K$283K$379K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$20K$20K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$156K$312K$467K$623K$623K$623K$623K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$154K$308K$463K$617K$617K$617K$617K
A/R Days Reduction$0$126K$253K$379K$379K$379K$379K$379K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K
Cumulative$0$446K$893K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x74% / 15.8x78% / 18.0x82% / 20.1x84% / 21.2x86% / 22.2x
9.0x69% / 13.7x73% / 15.6x77% / 17.5x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.4x
10.0x64% / 12.0x69% / 13.7x73% / 15.4x75% / 16.3x76% / 17.1x
11.0x60% / 10.6x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x72% / 15.3x
12.0x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.9x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.1x
Headroom (turns)
47%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 47% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.4x, adding 5.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.1M$1.1M3.6%
Year 1$1.2M+$1.1M$2.3M7.2%
Year 2$1.2M+$1.6M$2.8M9.1%
Year 3$1.2M+$1.6M$2.9M9.2%
Year 4$1.3M+$1.6M$2.9M9.3%
Year 5$1.3M+$1.6M$2.9M9.5%
$11.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$32.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$21.1M
Value Created
$2.9M
Exit EBITDA
$1.8M
Organic Growth
$16.4M
RCM Value Creation
$2.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$312K$467K$623K$748K
Denial Rate Reductio$308K$463K$617K$740K
A/R Days Reduction$190K$284K$379K$455K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$20K$24K
Total$819K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.6%-23.0%-10.2%1.2%
P79
Net-to-Gross37.1%30.8%43.9%64.2%
P40
Occupancy10.7%19.8%35.2%60.5%
P11
Rev/Bed$2.2M$1.1M$2.4M$3.8M
P45
Exp/Bed$2.1M$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML