Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHINO VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHINO VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050586 | CA | 112 beds | Current EBITDA $11.9M → Pro Forma $17.1M (+$5.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$98.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$11.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$17.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$5.2M
Modeled Uplift
$3.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.4M (vs $5.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$63K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.0M$2.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.9M$54K$2.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$303K$899K$1.2M$3.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$63K$63K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$494K$988K$1.5M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$489K$979K$1.5M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$401K$802K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$32K$63K$63K$63K$63K$63K$63K
Cumulative$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x
9.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
10.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$11.9M$11.9M12.1%
Year 1$12.3M+$3.5M$15.8M15.9%
Year 2$12.7M+$5.2M$17.9M18.1%
Year 3$13.0M+$5.2M$18.2M18.5%
Year 4$13.4M+$5.2M$18.6M18.9%
Year 5$13.8M+$5.2M$19.0M19.3%
$119.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$209.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$90.0M
Value Created
$19.0M
Exit EBITDA
$19.0M
Organic Growth
$52.0M
RCM Value Creation
$19.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$988K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$979K$1.5M$2.0M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$601K$902K$1.2M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$32K$47K$63K$76K
Total$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 181 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.1%-20.5%-4.6%4.4%
P88
Net-to-Gross27.1%17.8%22.5%30.6%
P62
Occupancy41.7%44.4%58.8%72.4%
P21
Rev/Bed$883K$589K$1.0M$2.1M
P43
Exp/Bed$776K$641K$1.2M$2.3M
P34

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML