Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCY SAN JUAN MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:50 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCY SAN JUAN MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050516 | CA | 384 beds | Current EBITDA $-106K → Pro Forma $39.7M (+$39.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$756.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-106K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$39.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$39.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$29.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$39.8M
Modeled Uplift
$28.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $28.0M (vs $39.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$15.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$15.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$484K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$39.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$15.1M$15.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$14.6M$416K$15.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.3M$6.9M$9.2M$29.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$484K$484K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.8M$7.6M$11.3M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.7M$7.5M$11.2M$15.0M$15.0M$15.0M$15.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.1M$6.1M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$242K$484K$484K$484K$484K$484K$484K
Cumulative$0$10.8M$21.7M$32.3M$39.8M$39.8M$39.8M$39.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $39.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-0.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.5x
Headroom (turns)
100%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 100% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -0.0x, adding 99.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-106K$-106K-0.0%
Year 1$-110K+$26.5M$26.4M3.5%
Year 2$-113K+$39.8M$39.7M5.2%
Year 3$-116K+$39.8M$39.7M5.2%
Year 4$-120K+$39.8M$39.7M5.2%
Year 5$-123K+$39.8M$39.7M5.2%
$-1.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$436.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$437.4M
Value Created
$39.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-169K
Organic Growth
$397.9M
RCM Value Creation
$39.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.6M$11.3M$15.1M$18.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.5M$11.2M$15.0M$18.0M
A/R Days Reduction$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$11.0M
Clean Claim Rate$242K$363K$484K$581K
Total$19.9M$29.8M$39.8M$47.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 148 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.0%-15.8%-4.4%3.8%
P64
Net-to-Gross21.9%17.8%23.1%28.9%
P44
Occupancy72.5%54.8%65.7%75.3%
P70
Rev/Bed$2.0M$1.3M$1.9M$2.7M
P55
Exp/Bed$2.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.8M
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML