Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KFH - SAN DIEGO 2026-04-26 07:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KFH - SAN DIEGO
CCN 050515 | CA | 596 beds | Current EBITDA $50.1M → Pro Forma $115.3M (+$65.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.24B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$50.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$65.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$115.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$47.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$65.2M
Modeled Uplift
$41.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$23.9M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $41.2M (vs $65.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$24.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$24.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$15.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$793K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$65.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$24.8M$24.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$23.9M$681K$24.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.8M$11.3M$15.1M$47.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$793K$793K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.2M$12.4M$18.6M$24.8M$24.8M$24.8M$24.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.1M$12.3M$18.4M$24.5M$24.5M$24.5M$24.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.0M$10.1M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$397K$793K$793K$793K$793K$793K$793K
Cumulative$0$17.8M$35.5M$52.9M$65.2M$65.2M$65.2M$65.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $65.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x71% / 14.7x76% / 16.7x80% / 18.7x82% / 19.7x83% / 20.7x
9.0x66% / 12.7x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.3x77% / 17.2x78% / 18.1x
10.0x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.7x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x74% / 15.9x
11.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.3x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.2x
12.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.8x
Headroom (turns)
43%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 43% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.7x, adding 4.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$50.1M$50.1M4.0%
Year 1$51.6M+$43.5M$95.1M7.7%
Year 2$53.2M+$65.2M$118.3M9.6%
Year 3$54.7M+$65.2M$119.9M9.7%
Year 4$56.4M+$65.2M$121.6M9.8%
Year 5$58.1M+$65.2M$123.3M9.9%
$501.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.36B
Exit EV (11x)
$854.9M
Value Created
$123.3M
Exit EBITDA
$79.8M
Organic Growth
$651.9M
RCM Value Creation
$123.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$12.4M$18.6M$24.8M$29.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$12.3M$18.4M$24.5M$29.4M
A/R Days Reduction$7.5M$11.3M$15.1M$18.1M
Clean Claim Rate$397K$595K$793K$952K
Total$32.6M$48.9M$65.2M$78.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 87 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.0%-14.5%-5.4%4.0%
P74
Net-to-Gross30.6%17.3%23.7%29.8%
P79
Occupancy49.6%57.6%68.6%77.7%
P8
Rev/Bed$2.1M$1.4M$1.9M$2.8M
P59
Exp/Bed$2.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.9M
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML