Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SUTTER AUBURN FAITH HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SUTTER AUBURN FAITH HOSPITAL
CCN 050498 | CA | 64 beds | Current EBITDA $7.3M → Pro Forma $17.2M (+$10.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$189.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$17.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$10.0M
Modeled Uplift
$7.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.9M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.0M (vs $10.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$121K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.8M$3.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.6M$104K$3.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$581K$1.7M$2.3M$7.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$121K$121K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$946K$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$937K$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$768K$1.5M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$61K$121K$121K$121K$121K$121K$121K
Cumulative$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x72% / 15.2x77% / 17.3x81% / 19.4x83% / 20.4x85% / 21.4x
9.0x68% / 13.2x72% / 15.0x76% / 16.8x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.7x
10.0x63% / 11.6x68% / 13.2x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.7x75% / 16.5x
11.0x59% / 10.2x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x
12.0x55% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.9x
Headroom (turns)
45%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 45% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.6x, adding 4.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.3M$7.3M3.8%
Year 1$7.5M+$6.6M$14.1M7.5%
Year 2$7.7M+$10.0M$17.7M9.3%
Year 3$7.9M+$10.0M$17.9M9.5%
Year 4$8.2M+$10.0M$18.1M9.6%
Year 5$8.4M+$10.0M$18.4M9.7%
$72.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$202.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$129.5M
Value Created
$18.4M
Exit EBITDA
$11.6M
Organic Growth
$99.6M
RCM Value Creation
$18.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$4.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$4.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M$2.8M
Clean Claim Rate$61K$91K$121K$145K
Total$5.0M$7.5M$10.0M$11.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 131 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.8%-23.3%-5.8%1.9%
P79
Net-to-Gross27.0%20.3%26.3%40.6%
P51
Occupancy51.7%41.3%55.8%71.4%
P45
Rev/Bed$3.0M$497K$786K$1.9M
P91
Exp/Bed$2.8M$521K$863K$1.9M
P87

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML