Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CMH OF SAN BUENAVENTURA 2026-04-26 05:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CMH OF SAN BUENAVENTURA
CCN 050394 | CA | 170 beds | Current EBITDA $-38.1M → Pro Forma $-11.9M (+$26.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$498.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-38.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$26.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-11.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$19.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

77%
Realization (B)
$26.2M
Modeled Uplift
$20.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $20.2M (vs $26.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$319K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$26.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.0M$10.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.6M$274K$9.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.5M$4.5M$6.1M$19.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$319K$319K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.5M$5.0M$7.5M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.5M$4.9M$7.4M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$160K$319K$319K$319K$319K$319K$319K
Cumulative$0$7.1M$14.3M$21.3M$26.2M$26.2M$26.2M$26.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $26.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-38.1M$-38.1M-7.6%
Year 1$-39.3M+$17.5M$-21.8M-4.4%
Year 2$-40.4M+$26.2M$-14.2M-2.9%
Year 3$-41.7M+$26.2M$-15.4M-3.1%
Year 4$-42.9M+$26.2M$-16.7M-3.3%
Year 5$-44.2M+$26.2M$-18.0M-3.6%
$-381.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-197.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$183.6M
Value Created
$-18.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-60.7M
Organic Growth
$262.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-18.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.0M$7.5M$10.0M$12.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.9M$7.4M$9.9M$11.8M
A/R Days Reduction$3.0M$4.5M$6.1M$7.3M
Clean Claim Rate$160K$239K$319K$383K
Total$13.1M$19.7M$26.2M$31.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 208 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.6%-17.5%-4.5%3.8%
P43
Net-to-Gross29.2%17.9%22.3%29.2%
P75
Occupancy91.7%46.5%60.1%72.5%
P95
Rev/Bed$2.9M$780K$1.4M$2.2M
P88
Exp/Bed$3.2M$818K$1.6M$2.4M
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML