Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PACIFICA HOSPITAL OF THE VALLEY 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PACIFICA HOSPITAL OF THE VALLEY
CCN 050378 | CA | 133 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.1M → Pro Forma $1.5M (+$5.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$105.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$5.5M
Modeled Uplift
$3.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.7M (vs $5.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$67K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.1M$2.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.0M$58K$2.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$323K$957K$1.3M$4.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$67K$67K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$526K$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$520K$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$426K$853K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$34K$67K$67K$67K$67K$67K$67K
Cumulative$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-23.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
30.1x
Headroom (turns)
463%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 463% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -23.6x, adding 122.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.1M$-4.1M-3.9%
Year 1$-4.2M+$3.7M$-505K-0.5%
Year 2$-4.3M+$5.5M$1.2M1.2%
Year 3$-4.4M+$5.5M$1.1M1.0%
Year 4$-4.6M+$5.5M$949K0.9%
Year 5$-4.7M+$5.5M$812K0.8%
$-40.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$8.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$49.6M
Value Created
$812K
Exit EBITDA
$-6.5M
Organic Growth
$55.3M
RCM Value Creation
$812K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
A/R Days Reduction$640K$959K$1.3M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$34K$50K$67K$81K
Total$2.8M$4.1M$5.5M$6.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 193 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.9%-18.1%-3.6%4.8%
P49
Net-to-Gross57.3%17.9%22.5%29.4%
P93
Occupancy50.9%44.8%57.7%72.2%
P37
Rev/Bed$790K$623K$1.1M$2.2M
P33
Exp/Bed$821K$681K$1.4M$2.3M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML