Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SUTTER TRACY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 18:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SUTTER TRACY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 050313 | CA | 77 beds | Current EBITDA $13.2M → Pro Forma $21.6M (+$8.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$159.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$13.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$8.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$21.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$8.4M
Modeled Uplift
$5.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.5M (vs $8.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$102K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$8.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.2M$3.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.1M$88K$3.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$490K$1.5M$1.9M$6.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$102K$102K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$798K$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$790K$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$647K$1.3M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$51K$102K$102K$102K$102K$102K$102K
Cumulative$0$2.3M$4.6M$6.8M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $8.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.3x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.2x
9.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x
10.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
11.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x
12.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.3x
Headroom (turns)
20%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 20% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.2x, adding 3.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$13.2M$13.2M8.3%
Year 1$13.6M+$5.6M$19.2M12.0%
Year 2$14.0M+$8.4M$22.4M14.0%
Year 3$14.4M+$8.4M$22.8M14.3%
Year 4$14.9M+$8.4M$23.3M14.6%
Year 5$15.3M+$8.4M$23.7M14.9%
$132.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$260.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$128.7M
Value Created
$23.7M
Exit EBITDA
$21.0M
Organic Growth
$84.0M
RCM Value Creation
$23.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M
A/R Days Reduction$971K$1.5M$1.9M$2.3M
Clean Claim Rate$51K$77K$102K$123K
Total$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$10.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 149 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.3%-22.0%-5.1%3.6%
P86
Net-to-Gross28.8%19.3%25.2%36.9%
P64
Occupancy38.6%42.6%56.7%71.9%
P19
Rev/Bed$2.1M$516K$894K$2.1M
P73
Exp/Bed$1.9M$597K$1.0M$2.3M
P69

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML