Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCINO HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCINO HOSPITAL
CCN 050158 | CA | 82 beds | Current EBITDA $2.5M → Pro Forma $5.5M (+$3.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$56.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$3.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $3.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$692K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$36K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$31K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$174K$517K$692K$2.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$36K$36K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$284K$568K$853K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$281K$563K$844K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$231K$461K$692K$692K$692K$692K$692K
Clean Claim Rate$0$18K$36K$36K$36K$36K$36K$36K
Cumulative$0$814K$1.6M$2.4M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.7x77% / 17.6x79% / 18.6x81% / 19.5x
9.0x64% / 11.9x69% / 13.6x73% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x76% / 17.0x
10.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.2x72% / 14.9x
11.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x
12.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.4x60% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.6x
Headroom (turns)
40%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 40% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.9x, adding 4.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.5M$2.5M4.5%
Year 1$2.6M+$2.0M$4.6M8.1%
Year 2$2.7M+$3.0M$5.7M10.0%
Year 3$2.8M+$3.0M$5.8M10.2%
Year 4$2.9M+$3.0M$5.9M10.3%
Year 5$3.0M+$3.0M$5.9M10.5%
$25.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$65.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$39.9M
Value Created
$5.9M
Exit EBITDA
$4.1M
Organic Growth
$29.9M
RCM Value Creation
$5.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$568K$853K$1.1M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$563K$844K$1.1M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$346K$519K$692K$830K
Clean Claim Rate$18K$27K$36K$44K
Total$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 154 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.5%-23.0%-5.4%3.7%
P78
Net-to-Gross22.4%19.2%24.3%36.8%
P43
Occupancy21.1%42.9%56.9%71.5%
P3
Rev/Bed$693K$511K$905K$2.1M
P38
Exp/Bed$662K$601K$1.1M$2.2M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML