Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SHARP MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SHARP MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 050100 | CA | 832 beds | Current EBITDA $94.9M → Pro Forma $166.3M (+$71.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.36B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$94.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$71.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$166.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$52.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$71.4M
Modeled Uplift
$44.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$27.4M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $44.0M (vs $71.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$27.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$26.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$16.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$869K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$71.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$27.2M$27.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$26.1M$747K$26.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4.2M$12.4M$16.5M$52.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$869K$869K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.8M$13.6M$20.4M$27.2M$27.2M$27.2M$27.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.7M$13.4M$20.2M$26.9M$26.9M$26.9M$26.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.5M$11.0M$16.5M$16.5M$16.5M$16.5M$16.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$434K$869K$869K$869K$869K$869K$869K
Cumulative$0$19.4M$38.9M$57.9M$71.4M$71.4M$71.4M$71.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $71.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.3x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.4x
9.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x
10.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x
11.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
12.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.7x
Headroom (turns)
26%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 26% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.8x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$94.9M$94.9M7.0%
Year 1$97.8M+$47.6M$145.4M10.7%
Year 2$100.7M+$71.4M$172.1M12.7%
Year 3$103.7M+$71.4M$175.1M12.9%
Year 4$106.8M+$71.4M$178.3M13.1%
Year 5$110.0M+$71.4M$181.5M13.4%
$949.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.00B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.05B
Value Created
$181.5M
Exit EBITDA
$151.2M
Organic Growth
$714.2M
RCM Value Creation
$181.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$13.6M$20.4M$27.2M$32.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$13.4M$20.2M$26.9M$32.3M
A/R Days Reduction$8.3M$12.4M$16.5M$19.8M
Clean Claim Rate$434K$652K$869K$1.0M
Total$35.7M$53.6M$71.4M$85.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 29 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.0%-10.6%-4.9%4.1%
P82
Net-to-Gross20.4%19.7%26.3%30.3%
P32
Occupancy53.9%58.7%72.3%88.3%
P7
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.7M$2.2M$3.2M
P21
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.9M$2.1M$4.0M
P17

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML